Include to favorites
Log in Logout Register
Start Login Contact Help Photos What's new
Avanced Search
FAQ
RESULTS IN: TEXT IMAGES

Hello, Guest
Login  Register
Online: 129 visitors

Blogging (2)
Business (1)
Educational (2)
Gadgets (1)
Games (2)
High Tech News (1)
Internet (0)
PC (1)
PDA (0)
Photography (0)
Science (1)
Software (1)
Wireless (1)


Browse by date

<< November 2008 >>
MonTueWedThrFriSatSun
12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930




Recent searches

Popular searches

Hot this month

Weblogs Archive


GADGETS AND GAMES DIRECTORY :: > Business Register Weblog >  Business Tech Weblogs - WEEKLYBITS.COM GADGETS AND GAMES DIRECTORY
Silicon Alley Insider
generated by   en Blogger
SEND A FRIEND
Suscribing to  please login first
User: Login

Weblog covering digital business
Digital Business, Live From New York.Visit Silicon Alley Insider
Address URLhttp://www.alleyinsider.com/    Registered: 22-Mar-2008
Ads:

Send to email
Visit Verizon's New Mobile Music Service: Better, But Still Bad Verizon's New Mobile Music Service: Better, But Still Bad in General
By Silicon
el 30-Jun-2008

tin-can.jpgCheers to Verizon for making one of the first smart mobile music moves: It's going to let its subscribers buy DRM-free music and download it, over the air, to their phones.

This is a big deal. Every previous buy-a-song-on-your-phone scheme involved some kind of DRM that all but ensured your tunes would stay trapped on your handset. Selling it in MP3 format means you might actually get some utility out of your purchase.

Alas, Verizon, and/or the big music labels, still haven't figured out how to make mobile music work: They're trying to charge you a $1.99 a song -- a 100% premium -- for the privilege of downloading it into your RAZR.

This is the same stupid pricing system the carriers and labels have been pushing for years. And it's still not going to work. But it does mean we can save ourselves some time and simply cut and paste the argument we made a year ago -- the last time someone tried charging us a premium to buy a song on our phone.

Carriers and labels will argue that it costs more to transmit songs over the air to your phone, but that's their problem, not yours. Since 2003, when Steve Jobs introduced the iTunes store, the maximum price for a tune has been a buck a song, and given the ease with which most songs can be procured for free, the music industry should be happy to get that.

Sadly, we don't Verizon changing this anytime soon. In fact, the decision to go DRM-free means we're even less likely to see rational pricing schemes, because the carriers and labels think they're more likely to lose sales to piracy when they sell MP3s. We don't think that's true, but even if it was, who cares? They're going up against free, which gets them absolutely nothing. Time to make their offerings more competitive, not less.

See Also: eMusic's Mobile Mistake



Read 0 times

Suscribing to  please login first
Verizon

Photologs
TechCrunch Ad Rates Slashed 35%

rates1.gif - TechCrunch Ad Rates Slashed 35%
Más fotos TechCrunch Ad Rates Slashed 35% + fotos


21-Nov-2008
TechCrunch Ad Rates Slashed 35%

rates2.gif - TechCrunch Ad Rates Slashed 35%
Más fotos TechCrunch Ad Rates Slashed 35% + fotos


21-Nov-2008
Twitter's New MVP: Following Shaq Is Fun

shaq-twitter-1.gif - Twitter
Más fotos Twitter + fotos




21-Nov-2008

You have an error in your SQL syntax; check the manual that corresponds to your MySQL server version for the right syntax to use near 's New Mobile Music Service: Better, But Still Bad') AS score FROM blogdir_p' at line 1