Include to favorites
Log in Logout Register
Start Login Contact Help Photos What's new
Avanced Search
FAQ
RESULTS IN: TEXT IMAGES

Hello, Guest
Login  Register
Online: 138 visitors

Blogging (2)
Business (1)
Educational (2)
Gadgets (1)
Games (2)
High Tech News (1)
Internet (0)
PC (1)
PDA (0)
Photography (0)
Science (1)
Software (1)
Wireless (1)


Browse by date

<< November 2008 >>
MonTueWedThrFriSatSun
12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930




Recent searches

Popular searches

Hot this month

Weblogs Archive


GADGETS AND GAMES DIRECTORY :: > Business Register Weblog >  Business Tech Weblogs - WEEKLYBITS.COM GADGETS AND GAMES DIRECTORY
Silicon Alley Insider
generated by   en Blogger
SEND A FRIEND
Suscribing to  please login first
User: Login

Weblog covering digital business
Digital Business, Live From New York.Visit Silicon Alley Insider
Address URLhttp://www.alleyinsider.com/    Registered: 22-Mar-2008
Ads:

Send to email
Visit Viacom Doesn't Want Everyone's YouTube History. It Wants Chad Hurley's Viacom Doesn't Want Everyone's YouTube History. It Wants Chad Hurley's in VIAGOOG
By Silicon
el 13-Jul-2008

chad hurley.jpgViacom's line in the YouTube lawsuit privacy imbroglio: We don't really want to know who's watching what on Google's video service. Not entirely true: Turns out Viacom does want to know what founders Steve Chen, Chad Hurley and other YouTube employees have been uploading and watching.

So says CNET, which reports that Viacom's request for specific YouTubers' viewing data, is at the heart of the current impasse between Viacom and Google. Google (GOOG) is under court order to turn over some 12 terabytes of viewing data, dating back to the site's launch in 2005. And Viacom (VIA) has said it is willing to accept YouTube's user log with personal information like IP addresses and user names redacted.

But apparently Viacom doesn't believe that anonymity should extend to YouTube employees. It signals a two-pronged strategy in VIA's $1 billion copyright infringement suit: Viacom wants general viewing data to establish how much YouTube traffic is attributed to Viacom video (Jon Stewart, Spongebob clips, etc), and it wants to catch Chad, Steve, and other YouTube employees red-handed.

YouTube has long argued that it doesn't filter or monitor content, so it can't be held responsible for what's up on the site. But what if key YouTube employees were responsible for the upload of copyrighted video in the first place? It would certainly weaken a key YouTube defense--that its role is analogous to that of an ISP, and that not responsible for illegal acts by its users. It would also lend credence to the theory YouTube employees uploaded copyrighted material in the early days to help popularize the service.

See Also: YouTube Source Code Safe, But Your Viewing Records Aren't
Mark Cuban: Here's How YouTube Can Make Money (And Lose Market Share)
YouTube's Anti-Piracy System Takes The Weekend Off

Photo: Joi



Read 0 times

Suscribing to  please login first
Viacom Doesn

Photologs
TechCrunch Ad Rates Slashed 35%

rates1.gif - TechCrunch Ad Rates Slashed 35%
Más fotos TechCrunch Ad Rates Slashed 35% + fotos


21-Nov-2008
TechCrunch Ad Rates Slashed 35%

rates2.gif - TechCrunch Ad Rates Slashed 35%
Más fotos TechCrunch Ad Rates Slashed 35% + fotos


21-Nov-2008
Twitter's New MVP: Following Shaq Is Fun

shaq-twitter-1.gif - Twitter
Más fotos Twitter + fotos




21-Nov-2008

You have an error in your SQL syntax; check the manual that corresponds to your MySQL server version for the right syntax to use near 't Want Everyone's YouTube History. It Wants Chad Hurley's') AS score FROM b' at line 1