Include to favorites
Log in Logout Register
Start Login Contact Help Photos What's new
Avanced Search
FAQ
RESULTS IN: TEXT IMAGES

Hello, Guest
Login  Register
Online: 113 visitors

Blogging (2)
Business (1)
Educational (2)
Gadgets (1)
Games (2)
High Tech News (1)
Internet (0)
PC (1)
PDA (0)
Photography (0)
Science (1)
Software (1)
Wireless (1)


Browse by date

<< November 2008 >>
MonTueWedThrFriSatSun
12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930




Recent searches

Popular searches

Hot this month

Weblogs Archive


GADGETS AND GAMES DIRECTORY :: > Business Register Weblog >  Business Tech Weblogs - WEEKLYBITS.COM GADGETS AND GAMES DIRECTORY
Silicon Alley Insider
generated by   en Blogger
SEND A FRIEND
Suscribing to  please login first
User: Login

Weblog covering digital business
Digital Business, Live From New York.Visit Silicon Alley Insider
Address URLhttp://www.alleyinsider.com/    Registered: 22-Mar-2008
Ads:

Send to email
Visit Why Ad-Free And Web 2.0 Don't Mix Why Ad-Free And Web 2.0 Don't Mix in DISGOOGCKE
By Silicon
el 13-May-2008

free-sign.gifI have noticed a meme in the constant conversation about revenue models for web services recently. People are proposing a version of the 'freemium' business model with the following twist: a product has slightly intrusive (but contextually relevant) ads baked in that users can remove by paying a small monthly fee.

I understand the intuition of the people proposing this revenue model. They know that consumers dislike ads. But they also know that ads are a 'necessary evil' in order to make free web services sustainable, or even profitable. So, they're trying to strike a compromise with consumers that appeases both free-zealots and anti-advertising-zealots.

But, this revenue model seems silly to me. Advertisers pay a premium in order to reach people in their specific demographic with disposable income. This idea of people paying to remove ads ensures that the audience for your ads are actually CHEAPER than the average internet audience.

Why? Because the people in your audience with disposable income who are willing to pay for web services are the same ones that will self-select out of your audience for your ads. So, all that remains in your audience are people that are too cheap to opt out. That doesn't sound like the audience that Disney (DIS), Coca Cola (CKE), or even your average direct response advertiser wants to reach.

Paying to remove advertising is an interesting thought, but it's not fully baked at this point. The real sustainable solution is to create 'paid content' that your audience doesn't actually view as 'ads.' For example, the last time I tried Adblock Pro, I noticed that it didn't remove AdWords (GOOG) in other words, the creator of the ad blacklist I used saw AdWords more as content than as advertising. That's the real home run.

Andrew Parker is an associate at Union Square Ventures and blogs at The Gong Show, where the original version of this post ran.




Read 0 times

Suscribing to  please login first
Why Ad-Free And Web 2.0 Don

Photologs
BlackBerry Still Dominating, But iPhone Catching On With Businesses (AAPL)

smartphone-survey-nov08.gif - BlackBerry Still Dominating, But iPhone Catching On With Businesses (AAPL)
Más fotos BlackBerry Still Dominating, But iPhone Catching On With Businesses (AAPL) + fotos




20-Nov-2008
Announcing The Second Annual "Crunchies!"

crunchies07_2.jpg - Announcing The Second Annual "Crunchies!"
Más fotos Announcing The Second Annual "Crunchies!" + fotos




19-Nov-2008
Announcing The Second Annual "Crunchies!"

crunchies07_3_2.jpg - Announcing The Second Annual "Crunchies!"
Más fotos Announcing The Second Annual "Crunchies!" + fotos


19-Nov-2008

You have an error in your SQL syntax; check the manual that corresponds to your MySQL server version for the right syntax to use near 't Mix') AS score FROM blogdir_post WHERE MATCH (post_title, post_descriptio' at line 1